Showing posts with label avatar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label avatar. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Avatar - A Second Look

Because I am young and I have plenty of time and money to just throw away, I decided to drop the cash, don the glasses and view Avatar a second time. There is some big dumb part of me that desires to give films a second chance and with all of the financial and critical success that Avatar is recieving, I thought it would be worth it to give myself a second viewing a few weeks after my initial endeavor.

I've done this project a few times in the past, most notably with Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl (I fell asleep both times in it), Iron Man, and Star Trek, and unfortunately a second viewing just confirmed my initial feelings. However, I recently re-viewed State of Play on DVD and was surprised by just how much I loved it. It changed my opinion so much that it was bumped from a 'B' to an 'A-'. It put me in a charitable mood and I decided to extend my newfound grace and mercy to a film that was quickly becoming one of the more overrated films in pop culture. Below are my thoughts after the second viewing including some comments on things that I didn't get to in my first review, which can be found here

- All of my original thoughts on the storyline and character motivations were confirmed and deepened. Jake's motivations for switching sides and joining the Na'vi are simply too selfish. They are not explicitly selfish, but it's clear he enjoys this better body, the natural lifestyle, the new girlfriend, the rites of passage, flying through the air; and it overpowers any message about helping the Na'vi because it's the right thing to do. Instead of, "What your doing is wrong and their lives are sacred", it becomes, "What your doing is wrong, these people and there way of life are awesome!"


- It doesn't help that he Na'vi are simply too noble and too innocent over and against the greedy imperialistic American mercenaries. Jakes' Na'vi experience is spared all the normal trappings that come with overtly theocratic societies. The rituals (the chanting and convulsing circle) that in any other film would be looked upon as naive and dumb, are looked upon as cultural and in tune with nature in this film. The native religion they espouse would be laughed off the screen in most any other film, but is given a noble reality and scientific support.

- Jake is attacked by a pack of wild dog like animals who will literally kill him, a giant flying bird that attempts to kill him, yet there Jake accepts a reverence for nature because he ends up not getting hurt. I'd like to see how nature appealed to Jake if one of the beasts took his Avatar legs, then we'd see how well he warmed up to the new worldview.

- Sam Worthington is terrible for me as the lead here; he's neither a bad actor, nor a good actor, he just is. He's about the most bland lead character I can think of in a successful science fiction or fantasy picture. I honestly don't care for him, don't care for his character arc, and don't care much that he becomes a warrior by the end. Nothing attached to him works for me. It doesn't help me that he's made to mumble through tons of voice-over, barely registering much emotion other than, 'blah'. For whatever people thought of DiCaprio in Titanic, he was at least charismatic.

- Jake Sully's taming of his flying 'dragon' (I don't know what to call it), really is the best sequence of the film and is quite possibly one of the best sequences in all of 2009. It's the best example of all the positives of the film in one place. The visuals are at their most astonishing, the depth of 3-D is at it's greatest, and it's an experience that no one has ever really seen before on film. The music, sound design, film composition, pacing, writing, work perfectly to present a pretty darn riveting and captivating sequence.


- More impressed this go round with the 3-D and the special effects. While I enjoyed them both more and think that some sequences truly reach the 'photo realistic' stage, do people really think this is a 'revolutionary' step forward? Did they forget Return of the King, the Star Wars prequels (whose landscapes are just a step down from this), or even Davey Jones of Pirates of the Caribbean?

- The sound design is quite spectacular for this film. Nailed me to my seat a couple of times (especially the fall of hometree) and was exemplary in the taming your dragon sequence reference above. The score works and works very well, but certain musical cues reminded me of Titanic, I don't know why Horner or Cameron would allow those similarities.

- I really don't get the whole ground army strike in the last battle sequence. They don't explain too well where they drop off and exactly why they need a ground force to begin with. Why exactly have a large ground force right in the vicinity of the area your dropping a motherload of bombs? If anything, the army drew out the ground forces of the Na'vi away from where the bombs would strike. The claustrophobia of the jungle also gives the entire sequence a 'could be anywhere' feel and notches down the epic nature of the film in general.


- The final aerial battle was much better than I gave it credit for. Beautiful to watch, and filled with some good brutal action beats. I do wish it was held for a bit longer and included some more characters I cared about.

- The political commentary bugged me a bit more the second time around as it was a bit more blunt and apparent (and moronic) than the first time I saw it.

- I found myself bothered a bit more by the appearance of the Avatars than the first viewing. The faces of Jake, Grace and the other nerdy Avatar feel a bit cartoonish (since we see their human likeness as well), especially against the 'photo realistic' backdrops.


- 'I See You' is Cameron's attempt at a second 'Don't Let Go' catchphrase. It's worse, much worse, and it makes me cringe each time they say it.

- Overall, I would say I found myself more wrapped up in the film than the first viewing. That's good and bad for the film. The good points (visuals, 3-D, and action) were better this time out, and the weak points (story, characters, motivations, subtext) were more aggravating this time out.

- I honestly wonder what will be remembered about this film in the future. I don't think people will remember Jake or his girlfriend, or the villain either. I don't think people will dress as the Na'vi or desire to be one of the mercenary grunts. I honestly think the thing what will stick the most is the dragon flying and the visuals of Pandora. In other words, it will be special effects. I have no axe to grind so I have no stake in what Avatar's lasting impact on culture will be, but I honestly think that despite the big box office take, and several attempts to define Avatar as a movie that stands as a story more than f/x, this one just won't be remembered as a great story. Who knows, I could be wrong. Maybe that will require a third endeavor into the cinema.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Avatar Review Roundup

Avatar is quite the 'Event' film of December and it has sparked a whole wide range of reviews and critiques. I've collected a few of my favorite reviews on the film, good ones and bad ones, and assembled them here for you. Enjoy.

Decent Film Guide: Positive review from a Christian perspective- a good counterpoint to my review - http://tinyurl.com/yewxlv7

Excerpt: "Deep down, Avatar is bone-headed, but it’s also beautiful — not just exciting and technically impressive, like Jurassic Park, but wondrous and exhilarating. How many movies can you say that about? It may be an inch deep, but it’s a mile wide, it gushes and roars like Niagara Falls, and it’s a sight to behold."


Scott Mendelson: Positive review from one of my favorite film writers - http://tinyurl.com/yg358kt

Excerpt: "...Avatar is a stunning success. It is a staggering achievement in visual effects and 3D technology. More importantly, it is a well-acted drama and a rousing action-adventure picture. It absolutely demands to be seen on the biggest and best screen available. See it in 3D, see it in IMAX 3D. Heck, see it a second time in 2D (the aspect ratio is 2.35:1 for 2D and Real3D and 1.87:1 for IMAX 3D prints). Point being, the self-appointed king of the world is back, and he may just reclaim his crown. Avatar absolutely delivers."


Film Freak Central: A negative review from Walter Chaw, one of my favorite reviewers. Caution, his reviews do use a bit of foul language - http://tinyurl.com/yewt59o

Excerpt: "A morally, historically, socially, and politically childish amalgam of Pocahontas and Ferngully: The Last Rainforest, Avatar finds James Cameron--still the Cameron of Titanic (or the uncomfortably simpering T2, if we're honest with ourselves) rather than the Cameron of Aliens and The Terminator--trying his hand at being Kevin Costner: powerful, dim, and only relevant for a tiny window of time he doesn't realize has already closed."


Part-Time Critic: This is my original mostly negative review - http://tinyurl.com/yamnmsx

Excerpt: "All in all, Avatar is truly a 'Must Go' theatre experience for moviegoers. Cameron has genuinely captured what it's like to be in another world, creating astonishing visuals that will 'wow' you and giving you visceral experiences (taming your own flying dragon like creature) that will thrill you. Unfortunately, it's the heavy focus on the 'experience' of Pandora, the Navi, and their spiritual world, that ultimately undermines the films dramatic honesty and thematic integrity, turning characters and themes one-sided."

Monday, December 21, 2009

Avatar Review


Overall Grade: C+

It's taken me a couple of days to write my thoughts on Avatar, not because I find myself still mixed in thought, but because I'm still surprised at the unorthodox and odd journey the main character takes throughout the film. My attempt here will be to fairly convey my feelings about Avatar and it should be noted up front that it will contain spoilers about the plot and themes of the film. I cannot honestly review the film without delving into particulars, so if you wish to remain spoiler free then this review isn't for you. With that said, also note that I don't hold any grudge for this film (I really enjoy Cameron's films), but do feel there were some serious faults I'd like to share with everyone.

Avatar plays out like a futuristic retelling of Pocahontas, with the planet of Pandora substituting for the 'Indian World', the big blue Navi people subbing for Indians, and Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri (Zoe Saldana) replacing John Smith and Pocahontas respectively. I must admit up front that I'm not the biggest fan of the Pocahontas story, so I knew this film had an uphill battle in front of it.

Anyone who has studied the Pocahontas story or even briefly surveyed America's historical relationship with Native Americans knows that it is an often brutal and cruel one. Truly, it's a dark period of American history where many regrettable actions were taken and one that we should always be taught and reminded of. As Avatar began to unfold I felt it heading in this direction (indeed the structure of that story is there) and I think it would've fit perfectly within the film. However, Cameron takes Avatar into unexpected territory, one that shifts it away from the lessons of Pocahontas and American history (or for that matter World history). Cameron infuses the entire story with an peculiarly odd mother earth like spirituality that alters the themes of the film and invalidates all social or political commentary. Let me explain further.


In Pocohontas and stories like it, we've always learned about their nature focused worldviews; how there were Gods in the waters and in the skies, how there was a practical balance to living with nature and that we should respect the spirits that had the power to give or to take away. While we've always watched and listened to this belief with interested ears, we've never actually believed that it was a true worldview. Sure, we found compromises between our worldviews and theirs, but we never accepted that Gods were in the water and air. While we are willing today to listen to the values of sustainability and efficiency, we certainly don't then accept their Gods as well.

It's important to note because when it is argued that the Indians should be treated with kindness, compassion and equality it wasn't because we were afraid of their Gods, or because we would lose insight into a spiritual world we knew little about, or because they were just better stewards of the land; it was because they had worth and value as human beings. Sustainability, efficiency, and respect of nature were always important principles we've learned in our relationship with the Indians, but the overriding one has been compassion and equality. It's the overriding lessons from slavery and holocaust as well.


Avatar doesn't leave the spiritual nature of our Navi people mystical and interesting, like our relationship with Indians has been in history, but cements it as a biological and scientific fact. The Navi commune and interact with animals through a symbiotic like connection as well as with Eyra, the mother earth like God. In fact, Eyra herself plays a large role in deciding the final epic battle (in classic dues ex machina fashion).

It is this spiritual realism that plays a deciding factor in converting Jake Sully into changing sides; joining with the Navi and attacking the humans. Sully experiences the world and worldview of the Navi so vividly that he's accepted into their group and eventually see's the reality of Eyra. I mentioned in the beginning that this is unorthodox, because it's a completely unrelatable motivation for character transformation, not to mention misguided and small minded.


It's unrelatable because we don't experience similar changes in our world. Would you relate to an Oscar Schindler who finally decided to help save Jews because Itzhak Stern laid hands on him and the Hebrew God told him that the Germans were destroying the world he created? No. Oscar slowly transforms and discovers the worth and value of human life, no matter if it be Jew or German through his interactions with them and experiencing their humanity. This is something all people can relate to.

It's misguided because it misses the bigger tragedy. By focusing so much on the 'experience' of being Navi, of the 'experience' of living in the spiritual world of Pandora, Jake Sully's motivations for turning against the Americans, transform into "their way of life is better than our way of life". When a film is essentially about genocide, it's misguided to let your main moral message be, "Our way of life is better than your way of life". It becomes a war sprung out of issues, rather than what it should be, a war sprung out of injustice and inhumanity.


It's small minded because Jakes conversion essentially becomes selfish, rather than selfless. Where is the inspiration to sacrifice for the injustice? Where is the righteous anger to try and convince the humans what they are doing is wrong? Instead, by focusing again on Jakes 'experiences' both physical and spiritual, his conversion seems more about not wanting to lose the use of his legs, bed the girl, and be one with nature. I have a hard time imagining myself cheering on Leigh Anne Tuohy of The Blind Side if she actually was taking Michael Oher in so that she could experience more happiness by Ole Miss gaining a great football player. This is essentially what Avatar does.

I don't mind spiritual aspects and messages in films, but I feel that the way in which Cameron has incorporated it into Avatar, has rendered his characters and themes unrelatable, misguided, and small-minded. It is a shame because the story is supported by incredible special effects the likes of which we've never seen...well...the likes of which we rarely see...this much of in one movie. While Avatar contains the most photorealistic CG imagery to date (it should and will win the Oscar for visual effects), the hype about it being leagues different than anything else is over exaggerated. While Avatar looks better, it's not that much better than what can be found in something like Star Wars Episode III (which came out over four years ago).


The final action sequence is appropriately epic, but failed to work for me. If I'm honest, the central journey Jake Sully takes in this film so completely alienated me (no pun intended) from the emotion and experience of the film that I just wasn't 'feeling' it. On technical points though, it's a very good sequence.

All in all, Avatar is truly a 'Must Go' theatre experience for moviegoers. Cameron has genuinely captured what it's like to be in another world, creating astonishing visuals that will 'wow' you and giving you visceral experiences (taming your own flying dragon like creature) that will thrill you. Unfortunately, it's the heavy focus on the 'experience' of Pandora, the Navi, and their spiritual world, that ultimately undermines the films dramatic honesty and thematic integrity, turning characters and themes one-sided. I joked with a friend about this, but the more I think about it the more it seems to fit. For as high-minded as it tries to be, Avatar ultimately becomes a retelling of Independence Day with us as the alien invaders looking to mine another planet. Okay, okay, that was a little rough; Avatar does have better effects.

Friday, January 2, 2009

2009 Preview Part 1


With the 2008 year in film now falling behind us (even though I'm still waiting on certain 08' films to come to Tallahassee), I thought it would be fun to take a look at what the 2009 year of cinema holds for us. Even though it seems ridiculous to try and sum up a "year in film", I think its fun to categorize and analyze nonetheless. I found 2008 to be a generally disappointing year for me, but as I look forward to 2009, I can't help but get excited about a number of films.

I'll try and parcel out my expectations for the 2009 film year (based on the information that we currently have, keep in mind that it always changes) into two parts for easier consumption. In this first part, I'll give you my Top Ten most anticpated films of 2009 as well as my second tier of greatly anticipated films. In the second part, I'll talk about the films I want to like but have that nagging suspicion that I won't like it. Along with that, I'll go over the guilty pleasures I'm looking forward to as well as the other films I'm curious enough to keep my eye on. So without further ado, here are my top ten most hotly anticipated films of 2009.



10. X-Men Origins: Wolverine
- Directed by Gavin Hood
- Opens May 1st
- After The Dark Knight the standard for superhero films has reached ridiculous heights. Fortunately, I don't have very high expecations for this as a "film", but I do look forward to seeing some great high octane action sequences. The trailer leaves me netural, but I'm willing to get excited for the opener to this year's summer blockbuster season.


9. Inglorious Basterds
- Directed by Quentin Tarantino
- Opens Aug. 21
- I'm hoping that this WWII Action film is more Kill Bill or Resevoir Dogs than it is Deathproof. No matter though, anytime Quentin comes out with a film, its an event. The fact that he has cast Mike Myers in a role has also peaked my interest.


8. Where the Wild Things Are
- Directed by Spike Jonze
- Opens Oct. 16
- It was a troubled production, but I can't wait to see what creativity Spike Jonze (Being John Malkovich, Adapation) brings to this adaptation.


- Directed by Pete Doctor and Bob Peterson
- Opens May 29
- Pixar's Summer 2009 entry comes from the director and writer of Monster's Inc. I haven't really enjoyed a Pixar film since 2004's The Incredibles, and I hope that this is a return to form here. I hope that this May release hearkens back to the last time Pixar released a movie in May, Finding Nemo.



6. Terminator Salvation
- Directed by McG
- Opens May 22
- Early production materials really make this film look like its going to take the Terminator franchise into a whole new direction. Terminator 3:Rise of the Machines left us the with judgment day and it looks like Terminator Salvation is really going full throttle with the aftermath. I actually have high expectations for the McG the director, and hope that he brings the talent he showed on the horribly underrated Charlies Angels: Full Throttle (yes, I'm being serious) to this new franchise.

- Directed by Martin Scorsese
- Opens Oct. 2
- If the director alone doesn't get you excited then did you know that this is his first feature film since he won the oscar for The Departed (Shine a Light doesn't count)? Did you know that the screenplay is based on a novel written by Dennis Lehane, the writer of Gone Baby Gone and Mystic River? Excited yet? Well, did you know that Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Emily Mortimer, Max Von Sydow, Michelle Williams, Patricia Clarkson, and Jackie Earle Haley are all this film? If that isn't enough for you, then I suggest you give up on cinema.

- Directed by Prachya Pinkaew
- Opens Feb. 6th
- I know that most of you are probably going saying, "Huh?" Let me explain. If you are a martial arts fan, then there is no more exciting country putting out martial arts film today than Thailand. Thanks to Tony Jaa and Prachya Pinkaew (both worked on Ong Bak and The Protector), as well as numerous others, Thailand is currently putting out some of the craziest and freshest fight films avaliable. Just watch the trailer for the film (LINK IS HERE), and tell me that it doesn't get you excited to watch some crazy martial arts action? No? Well, it does for me anyways.


- Directed by Michael Mann
- Opens July 1st
- A 1930s gangster film directed by Michael Mann (Heat, The Insider) and starring Christian Bale and Johnny Depp. The only thing that could make it better is if it was released during the summer...oh wait...it is. Can you imagine? Going into a dark theatre on a hot summer afternoon to watch this?


- Directed by Peter Jackson
- Opens Dec. 11th
- When the director of your favorite film of all-time (Return of the King) puts out a new film, you take notice. When its a pet project that has been in the works for over a decade, you take an even closer look. I don't quite know the storyline or the details, but I don't mind.


- Directed by James Cameron
- Opens Dec. 18th
- Cameron's first feature film since Titanic, and its no simple comedy or romance. Avatar is advertised as the future of film. Several years in development, if Cameron accomplishes what he has claimed, Avatar will present the cutting edge of computer enhanced effects as well as the cutting edge of 3-d presentation. Did I mention that when Cameron makes a sci-fi film they automatically enter in as classics? With titles like Aliens, Terminator, The Abyss, and Terminator 2, whats to think this film will be a disappointment?

Most Anticipated Films: Second Tier (In Alphabetical Order)
A Christmas Carol : Jim Carey and Robert Zemeckis team for this remake
Coraline: from the maker of Corpse Bride
Duplicity: Looks like a fun spy game from Julia Roberts and Clive Owen
Edge of Darkness: Mel Gibson's first leading role in years
The Fantastic Mr. Fox: Wes Anderson presents an animated feature
Gentlemen Broncos : from the writer/director of Napoleon Dynamite
I Love You, Man : based soley on the hilarious trailer you can watch HERE
Julia and Julia : Meryl Streep plays British chef Julia Childs
Monsters vs. Aliens: 3-D animated feature releasing in March
The Princess and the Frog: Disney's great return to handdrawn animation, releases on Christmas
The Road: from the director of The Proposition and the writer of No Country for Old Men
Sherlock Holmes: Action oriented and featuring Robert Downey Jr. has raised my interest
Surrogates: Bruce Willis in Sci-Fi action directed by Jonathan Mostow, Yes!
Taken : Liam Neeson in an action role written by Luc Besson
The Three Stooges : Farrelly Brothers finally doing a dream project

Stay Tuned For Part II, Coming Soon!